3 Simple Steps to a Secured Loan

Submitting Details...
Step 1 of 3 About your loan
 
 
 
 
 
 

Step 2 of 3 About your loan

Is secured on your home. Rates depend on your circumstances; usually lower than an unsecured loan and often more flexible.

Not secured on your home. May not qualify you for the best rates. Applying to a number of lenders may affect your credit score.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Step 2 of 3 About your loan

Based on your information we recommend you speak to a personal debt adviser.

They will offer you advice on:
  • Whether a loan is your best option
  • Consolidating your debts
  • Reducing the amount you owe
  • How to freeze your interest payments
  • Protecting you from creditors

Step 3 of 3 Your details
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Finished


Thank you for your enquiry.

Your adviser will be in touch with you shortly.


Recent Posts
  • All the day’s Money stories

  • Wedgwood Museum closure condemned by Unesco
    Museum listed as one of world’s top 20 cultural assets due to be sold off to pay £134m pension deficit after high court ruling The head of a Unesco committee that shortlisted a British museum as one of the world’s top 20 cultural assets has condemned a high court judgment that is forcing it to close. The

  • In praise of … switching your bank | Editorial
    Let’s move our money from big banks to credit unions, ethical banks and building societies What do the bankers do – work tirelessly on your behalf, or work for themselves on your money? We have an option – to move our money, but few of us actually do. In fact, we are more likely to divorce

  • Corporate banker in Japan: ‘I don’t see much innovation coming out of the UK’ | Joris Luyendijk
    A vice-president of a major western bank in Tokyo compares the banking cultures of Japan and the west • This monologue is part of a series in which people across the financial sector speak about their working lives We are meeting in the centre of Tokyo on a Saturday in January. Casually dressed for the weekend, he

  • Call for ‘industry standard’ to protect investors from hidden charges
    Hidden charges make it difficult for investors to compare funds. Now Fidelity is calling for a simple charging structure so the true cost is clear to all Fidelity Worldwide Investment is calling on investment fund companies to adopt an industry standard breakdown of costs to help end hidden charges that can damage investors’ returns. The firm

Letters: Making sure the lights don’t go out

Given the long lead times for building new electricity capacity we should all be concerned that around a quarter of the UK’s electricity generating capacity must be replaced in the next 10 years (Only state intervention can keep the lights on, says Ofgem, 4 February). However, it is even more worrying that plans to replace this shortfall are so poorly advanced. Some 20 gigawatts of new capacity are “under way”, but only 8GW is actually under construction. It would not take much to go wrong for power cuts to become widespread.

However, before politicians start blaming the UK’s liberalised energy ­markets and call for a return to full government control, it is worth remembering that political indecision has contributed greatly to the possibility of an “energy crunch”. Investors in new capacity can deal with market risks, but often find the burden of political and regulatory risk more challenging. Demonising large energy companies over their pricing and threatening windfall taxes may win votes, but it will not bring new capacity on line. Delays in obtaining planning approval for new power stations do not help either.

Graeme Leach

Chief economist, Institute of Directors

• Ofgem’s Damascene conversion to state supervision of the privatised energy industry is a big step in the right direction. This is long overdue in a world of pretend competition that characterises the results of past dogmatic privatisations. However, more radical changes are needed if the new CEGB is given a proper role, including: responsibility for planning and commissioning capacity; reducing the absurd plethora of pricing schemes to a small number of national tariffs; reversing the structure of current tariffs so that low-energy users are no longer penalised; raising the 5% energy VAT to the general rate and phasing in carbon pricing; setting and enforcing energy-saving targets for the energy companies. Above all, dealing with climate change demands that the energy ­industry is controlled by the state and not just influenced by it.

Patrick Newman

Director of IT development, Energywatch 2000-02

•?Hidden deep in the appendices of Ofgem’s Project Discovery report is the unnerving admission that four of the six main energy suppliers consider the findings to be too optimistic; uSwitch warns that bills could top £4,000 a year by 2020 (£2,000-a-year fuel bill nears, 4 January). Any massive rise in the cost of energy will not just affect domestic consumers, but all industrial, commercial and public sector consumers as well. Cheap energy has been the lifeblood of our extravagant existence, and the impact of higher costs on the economy and our lifestyles could be profound.

The report focuses on the £200bn of capital investment required. I can’t see the equally vital analysis of likely future gas prices, in the context of rapidly approaching peak oil. While gas is more abundant than oil, their prices are closely linked. As we wean ourselves off fossil fuels, our appetite for electricity will grow. Ground-source heat pumps, battery charging and hydrolising water all need reliable electricity supplies.

We are told that the government will be making announcements on this issue at the time of the budget. Let’s hope that this government and the next one really get to grip with the issue.

Jeffrey Streule

Stewkley, Bedfordshire

•?It is good news that British Gas has dropped the unfair price differential on pre-payment meters, which effectively meant those customers on the least income were often paying the most (Money, 6 February). Charities such as ours have often criticised meter tariffs as aggravating fuel poverty. However, while pre-payment customers will now pay the same as customers paying with cash or cheque, they will still pay more than those able to pay via direct debit. Many poor families aren’t able to do this. Moreover, even with the cuts, there are cheaper suppliers to be found online – but the same vulnerable families are often without access to the internet. British Gas’s initiative is welcome but cannot address this problem alone.

Helen Dent

Chief executive, Family Action


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Need a Loan? Visit Secured Loans Broker.



Leave a Reply