3 Simple Steps to a Secured Loan

Submitting Details...
Step 1 of 3 About your loan
 
 
 
 
 
 

Step 2 of 3 About your loan

Is secured on your home. Rates depend on your circumstances; usually lower than an unsecured loan and often more flexible.

Not secured on your home. May not qualify you for the best rates. Applying to a number of lenders may affect your credit score.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Step 2 of 3 About your loan

Based on your information we recommend you speak to a personal debt adviser.

They will offer you advice on:
  • Whether a loan is your best option
  • Consolidating your debts
  • Reducing the amount you owe
  • How to freeze your interest payments
  • Protecting you from creditors

Step 3 of 3 Your details
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Finished


Thank you for your enquiry.

Your adviser will be in touch with you shortly.


Recent Posts
  • All the day’s Money stories

  • Santander Q&A: is your money safe?
    With the eurozone turmoil spreading to banks in Spain, we look at what the effect could be on Santander customers Santander is the British high street giant with a Spanish parent group. Will the pain in Spain spread to Britain? Already Twitter is alive with speculation, with customers of the bank wondering what it means for

  • Facebook shares: are you buying? | Poll
    Facebook shares are being offered to the public at $38 (£24) each, valuing the company at more than $100bn before its flotation on the stock market. Are you planning to buy any?

  • Chic ladies’ bikes: review of three new models | Caz Nicklin
    Caz Nicklin test drives the Bobbin Birdie, the Caféracer Doppio Lady and the Hob 3 As a woman hell-bent on promoting cycling as a desirable lifestyle choice, I am always keen to hear about exciting new ladies’ bikes. Five years ago, the choice for a female commuter like me was limited to uninspiring hybrids or expensive

  • Why has my decision to apply for promotion attracted such apathy?
    I thought I would get some words of encouragement to apply for a senior management role, but support is not forthcoming On Friday and Monday we will publish the problems that will feature in a forthcoming Dear Jeremy advice column in the Guardian Work supplement, so readers can offer their own advice and suggestions. We then

Ruling could land lenders with £20bn bill

Banks and building societies could be forced to return more than £20bn to consumers after the court threw out their appeal over unauthorised overdraft charges and bounced cheques yesterday.

The court ruled that the charges should be regulated by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) under “unfair contract” rules, clearing the way for the watchdog to set a legal maximum on the fees, which currently earn banks about £2.6bn a year.

Banks have been charging consumers up to £39 for a bounced cheque, standing order or direct debit, although critics say the actual cost could be as little as £2. Although some have reduced their charges in recent months, many are still charging more than £30.

The OFT said the ruling was “very clear confirmation” that it could regulate current account terms and conditions. “This judgment confirms the OFT’s long-held interpretation of this important aspect of consumer law, and is one that consumers themselves would identify with. It is also relevant to businesses across the whole economy,” it said.

Three years ago, the OFT told credit card firms they must limit default charges to £12, and it could now take a similar line with current account providers. The regulator is examining the banks’ terms and conditions and will announce what action will be taken later this year.

The ruling follows a test case last year between the OFT and eight current account providers that was brought after consumers began to contest bank charges, downloading millions of template letters and sending them to banks, which paid out rather than contesting the claims in court.

In yesterday’s judgment the master of the rolls, Sir Anthony Clarke, sitting with Lords Justice Waller and Lloyd, held that the charges for unauthorised overdrafts were not part of the “core or essential” bargain between bank and customer, and therefore an assessment of fairness was not precluded by the regulations.

Martin Lewis, the founder of MoneySavingExpert.com, who alongside Guardian Money has been a campaigner against the charges, said: “The smiles on the OFT’s faces in court show it is highly likely it will find that charges are unfair. After that I would hope that within the next year everyone who has had charges unfairly taken from their bank account will get them back.”

Mark Gander, of the Consumer Action Group, said if the fees were found to be unfair, consumers could sue their banks to get back all fees charged since the unfair contracts regulation was introduced.

However, it seems unlikely that consumers will get their money back soon. Although the seven banks and one building society involved were not given leave to appeal, they said they would contest the judgment. In the meantime, a Financial Services Authority waiver will remain in place. This allows banks and building societies to sit on complaint letters until the conclusion of the case.

Doug Taylor, for the consumer group Which?, said: “In the context of the decline in [the banks'] reputation it would be bizarre if they decided to appeal. For them to engage in spending more money to defend a lost cause would be unfortunate to say the least.” Gander added: “The Lords is going to knock back the banks. This is just a delaying tactic - every day they delay it they are earning more and more interest.”

What happens next

Can I get my charges back?

Not yet. The ruling just allows the OFT to investigate the charges. It needs to decide whether the banks will have to proactively return money.

What should I do while I wait?

If you have paid overdraft charges since 27 July 2001 you should write to your bank requesting a refund. The Financial Services Authority has granted banks and building societies a waiver, allowing them to sit on these letters until the case is over. But if you write now, your complaint will be in the system.

I am struggling with money. How am I expected to cope while the waiver is in place?

It does not apply to letters from consumers in financial difficulty - which it defines as someone who cannot cover reasonable living expenses and bills.

How far back can I reclaim charges?

You can claim anything paid since 27 July 2001.

Hilary Osborne

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Need a Loan? Visit Secured Loans Broker.

Leave a Reply